Since most criminal defendants cannot afford to hire an attorney to provide constitutionally mandated legal services, states commonly use either private court-appointed attorneys or a public defender organization; this paper investigates the relative efficacy of these two modes of indigent defense by comparing outcomes of codefendants assigned to different types of attorneys within the same case.
ABST
Using data from San Francisco, I show that in multiple defendant cases, public defender assignment is plausibly as good as random. I find that public defenders reduce the probability of any prison sentence by 22% and the length of prison sentences by 10%. (Publisher abstract provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Preventing the Next Sext: A Behavioral Economic Approach to Understanding Non-consensual Nude Photo Sharing Decisions in a High School Community
- Leaving Gangs and Desisting from Crime Using a Multidisciplinary Team Approach: A Randomized Control Trial Evaluation of the Gang Reduction Initiative of Denver
- Adolescent Contact, Lasting Impact? Lessons Learned From Two Longitudinal Studies Spanning 20 Years of Developmental Science Research With Justice-System-Involved Youths