NIJ Conference 2009
The Honorable Steven S. Alm
Judge, First Circuit Court
Honolulu, Hawaii
I was getting motions to revoke probation, almost always recommending prison, because the probation officer was just unsuccessful in getting the offenders to change their behavior — to stop using drugs, to go to treatment — and I thought, "Now, what would work? What would work to change people's behavior?" And as I thought of it, I thought, "What does a parent do? And what do I do as a parent?" If my child did something wrong, I gave him a consequence right away, whether it was taking away privileges, whatever, but I talked to him about it, but I gave him the consequence right away.
And "swift and certain" is something you hear a lot of talk about, but it's almost never done in the criminal justice system, so that's what we started doing four and a half years ago. If an offender violates a condition of probation, we give them a swift and certain consequence. That means they're arrested immediately, they're held in custody, we have a hearing typically two business days later, and they get a short time of incarceration. That way they can tie together the behavior that's bad — whether it's testing positive for drugs, not going to see their probation officer — with a consequence and learn from it.
Because some of the folks we're dealing with, we're rehabilitating; others we're habilitating. I think they've never had a situation in their life where they actually had a consequence from a behavior and learned from it. Because we want them all to succeed on probation, just like we want our kids to succeed in life. But I think our current probation system, without meaning to, is akin to a parent ignoring what their kid does for repeated things, and then next year, kicking them out of the house.
Information generated by the National Institute of Justice is in the public domain. It may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without permission. Please cite NIJ as the source of the information by using the following words:
"The [insert the name of you organization] gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, for allowing us to reproduce, in part or in whole, the video [insert title]. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this video are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice."
The content presented in this video results from NIJ-funded research, development and evaluation projects. The content is not intended to create, does not create, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter civil or criminal.
Opinions or points of view expressed in this video represent those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Any products and manufacturers discussed in this video are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product approval or enforcement by the U.S. Department of Justice.
See additional Legal Policies and Disclaimers for all U.S. Department of Justice Web content.
Date Modified: September 11, 2009