U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

A Unified Characterization of Population Structure and Relatedness

NCJ Number
300623
Author(s)
B. S. Weir; J. Goudet
Date Published
2017
Length
19 pages
Annotation

Regarding a unified characterization of population structure and relatedness in population genetic activities, this article recasts the authors’ treatments of population structure, relatedness, and inbreeding to make explicit that the parameters of interest involve the differences in degrees of allelic dependence between the target and the reference sets of alleles, and so can be negative

Abstract

Many population genetic activities - ranging from evolutionary studies to association mapping, to forensic identification - rely on appropriate estimates of population structure or relatedness. All applications require recognition that quantities with an underlying meaning of allelic dependence are not defined in an absolute sense, but instead are made "relative to" some set of alleles other than the target set. The 1984 Weir and Cockerham [Formula: see text] estimate made explicit that the reference set of alleles was across populations, whereas standard kinship estimates do not make the reference explicit. Weir and Cockerham stated that their [Formula: see text] estimates were for independent populations, and standard kinship estimates have an implicit assumption that pairs of individuals in a study sample, other than the target pair, are unrelated or are not inbred; however, populations lose independence when there is migration between them, and dependencies between pairs of individuals in a population exist for more than one target pair. The authors’ recasting of their treatments of population structure, relatedness, and inbreeding make explicit that the parameters of interest involve the differences in degrees of allelic dependence between the target and the reference sets of alleles, and so can be negative. They take the reference set to be the population from which study individuals have been sampled, and they provide simple moment estimates of these parameters, phrased in terms of allelic matching within and between individuals for relatedness and inbreeding, or within and between populations for population structure. A multi-level hierarchy of alleles within individuals, alleles between individuals within populations, and alleles between populations, enables a unified treatment of relatedness and population structure. The authors expect their new measures to have a wide range of applications, but they note that their estimates are sensitive to rare or private variants: some population-characterization applications suggest exploiting those sensitivities, whereas estimation of relatedness may best use all genetic markers without filtering on minor allele frequency. (publisher abstract modified)