This article presents the strengths and weaknesses of various crime forecasting algorithms and argues that, to be efficient and realistic, models should be used in conjunction with other measures.
Hot-spot maps regularly aid many policing resource allocation decisions in today’s data-driven age. However, it is unclear what forecasting algorithm(s) should be used to create these maps. To address this gap, we must be able to assess how “good” a generated hot-spot map is. Currently, four main metrics are used for evaluation: the prediction accuracy index (PAI), the recapture rate index (RRI), the prediction efficiency index (PEI), and the prediction efficiency index* (PEI*). This article discusses PAI, RRI, and PEI’s strengths and weaknesses, articulates and justifies PEI*, and demonstrates the differences in calculations and interpretations of each metric. The authors argue that PEI* measures the efficiency of a crime forecasting algorithm while being operationally realistic and should be used in conjunction with other appropriate measures. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Comparing Individuals Who Engage in Violent Extremism and Similar Acts: What Research Sponsored by the National Institute of Justice Tells Us
- ChatGPTing Securely: Using Machine Learning to Automate Writing Rape Reports, Closed Source Large Language Models
- 3-month Prevalence of Unwanted Sexual Contact Victimization in a National Sample of College Students: Differences by Race, Gender Identity, and Sexual Identity