|
|
 |
Publications
Process Evaluations
- Bureau of Justice Assistance (1993). Multijurisdictional narcotics enforcement task forces: Lessons learned from the OCN model. Washington, DC: Author.
- Craven, D. (1995). Vermont's drug task force: Perceptions and effectiveness. The Dataline Justice Research Bulletin 4 (1). Montpelier: Vermont Center for Justice Research.
- Dewey, J. (1995). Combining qualitative and quantitative data in an evaluation of multijurisdictional drug enforcement units. Carbondale, IL: Southern University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Crime, Delinquency, and Corrections.
- Jacoby, J., Hammond C., Ratledge E. and Ward S. (1999). Evaluation of Illinois' multijurisdictional drug prosecution programs and local drug prosecution support programs. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Schmitz, R., Wassenberg, P. S., Gransky, L., Hagner, P. G., Sims, P. L, Magnusen, L. R., Reidel, M., O'Sullivan, W., & Sweat, G. (1998). An evaluation of the homicide and violent crime strike force program in Madison and St. Clair counties. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
Outcome Evaluations
- Bynum, T., Decker, S. and Swift, D. (1999). Final report: Evaluation of the Kankakee county violent crime task force. (Available from the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, Chicago, IL).
- California State University. (2003). Evaluation of multijurisdictional task forces in California: Final report of the California State University, Sacramento. California: Author.
- Cárdenas, G. G. (2002). An assessment of the multijurisdictional drug task forces in Texas: A case study. Texas: Texas State University-San Marcos, Political Science Department Public Administration.
- Craven, D. (1995). Vermont's drug task force: Perceptions and effectiveness. The Dataline Justice Research Bulletin 4 (1). Montpelier: Vermont Center for Justice Research.
- Decker, S., Bynum, T., Curry, G. D. and Swift, D. (2000). Evaluation of the Kankakee metropolitan enforcement group. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Dewey, J. (1995). Combining qualitative and quantitative data in an evaluation of multijurisdictional drug enforcement units. Carbondale, IL: Southern University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Crime, Delinquency, & Corrections.
- Hayeslip, D. and Russell-Einhorn, M. (2002). Evaluation of multijurisdictional task forces project: Phase 1 final report. Washington, DC: Abt. Associates.
- Herzik, E., Bartridge, J., & Hoyt, R. (1998). Evaluating the effectiveness of Nevada's multijurisdictional narcotics task forces. Reno, NV: The Great Basin Policy Research Institute.
- Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (2006). Meth response team easing burden on localized drug task forces. Research at a glance, 1, (7), 1-2.
- Jacoby, J. E., Hammond, C. B., Ratledge, E. C., & Ward, S. W. (1999). Evaluation of Illinois' multijurisdictional drug prosecution programs and local drug prosecution support programs. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Jefferis, E., Frank, J., Smith, B., Novak, K. and Travis, L. (1998). An examination of the productivity and perceived effectiveness of drug task forces. Police Quarterly 1 (3).
- Justice Research and Statistics Association. (1992). Law enforcement task force evaluation projects: Results and findings in the states. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.
- Kirchner, R. and Robinson, K. (2000). Assessment of the judicial district multijurisdictional task forces: Past progress and future direction. Nashville, TN: Author.
- Olson, D. E., Albertson, S., Brees, J., Cobb, A., Feliciano, L., Juergens, R., Ramker, G. F., & Bauer, R. (2002). New approaches and techniques for examining and evaluating multijurisdictional drug task forces in Illinois. Chicago, IL: University of Loyola.
- Nunn, S., Quinet, K., & Newby, W. (2005). Indiana multijurisdictional drug task forces, 2002 and 2003. Indianapolis, Indiana: Center for Urban Policy and the Environment.
- Pennell, S., Melton, R., & Hoctor, D. (1996). Assessment of a Multi-agency approach to drug involved gang members. San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Governments, Criminal Justice Research Division.
- Purintun, C., Bates, D., Brewster, D., Fine, K., Wiens, A., Wright, D., Huntington, D., Connelly M., & O'Connell, P. (1997). An initial evaluation of multijurisdictional drug task forces in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Criminal Justice Resource Center.
- The Research and Analysis Unit. (2004). Special Focus: The impact of Methamphetamine on Illinois' Metropolitan Enforcement Groups and Task Forces. Chicago, Illinois: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Schmitz, R., Wassnenberg, P. S., Gransky, L., Hagner, P. G., Sims, P. L., Magnusen, L. R., Reidel, M., O'Sullivan, W., & Sweat, G. (1998). An evaluation of the homicide and violent crime strike force program in Madison and St. Clair counties. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Schlegel, K., & McGarrell, E. F. (1991). An examination of arrest practices in regions served by multijurisdictional drug task forces. Crime & Delinquency, 37, (3), 408-426.
- Smith, B. W., Novak, K. J., Frank J., & Travis, L. F. (2000). Multijurisdictional drug task forces: An analysis of impacts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, (6), 543-556.
- Ward, R. H. (2001). TNCP: Measuring and evaluating narcotics task force's performance. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston University, Criminal Justice Center.
Other Task Force Reports
- Arizona Criminal Justice Commission. (2004). Enhanced drug and gang enforcement (EDGE) report. Phoenix, Arizona: Author.
- Buhler, M. L. (1999). The fugitive task force as an alternative organizational model. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 68 (4).
- Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1994). A report to the attorney general: Multijurisdictional task forces use of overtime and related issues FY1994. Washington, DC: Author.
- Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1997). Multijurisdictional task forces: Ten years of research and evaluation (a report to the attorney general). Washington, DC: Author.
- Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2000). Creating a new criminal justice system for the 21st century: Findings and results from state and local program evaluations. Washington, DC: Author.
- Caulkins, J., & Renter, P. (1998). What price data tells us about drug markets. Journal of Drug Issues 28 (3).
- Coldren, J., McGarrell, E., Sabath, M., Schlegel, K., & Stolzenberg, L. (1993). Multijurisdictional drug task force operations: Results of a nationwide survey of task force commanders. Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.
- General Accounting Office. (1999). Drug control: DEA's strategies and operations in the 1990s. Washington, D.C.: Author.
- General Accounting Office. (2001). Department of Justice: Status of achieving key outcomes and addressing major management challenges. Washington, DC: Author.
- General Accounting Office. (2002). Results oriented management: Agency crosscutting actions and plans in drug control, family poverty, financial institution regulation, and public health systems. Washington, DC: Author.
- Hayeslip, D. W., Dunworth, T., & Russell-Einhorn, M. L. (n. d.). Evaluation of multi-jurisdictional task forces in the United States, 1999-2000 (Description-Study No. 3865). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium For Political and Social Research. Retrieved September 14, 2004, from http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR-STUDY/03865.xml
- Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (1999). Kankakee MEG unit employs problem-solving approach to combat drug crime. On Good Authority 3 (4). Chicago, IL: Author.
- Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (2003). A comparison of local and multijurisdictional drug enforcement efforts in Illinois. On Good Authority 6 (6). Chicago, IL: Author.
- Illinois Criminal Justice Authority Research & Analysis Unit. (2002). A summary of drug enforcement activities across Illinois' multijurisdictional enforcement groups and task forces. Chicago, IL: Author.
- Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, Research and Analysis Unit. (2004). Assessing Illinois' metropolitan enforcement groups and task forces. Chicago, Illinois: Author.
- Justice Research & Statistics Association. (1993). Multijurisdictional drug control task forces: A five year review 1988-1992. Washington, DC: Author.
- McGarrell, E. F., & Schlegel, K. (1991). An evaluation of the south central Indiana and tri-county narcotics task forces. Indianapolis: Indiana Criminal Justice Institute.
- Murphy, G. R., Wexler, C., Davies, H. J., & Plotkin, M. (2004). Managing a multijurisdictional case: Identifying the lessons learned from the sniper investigation. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
- National Institute of Justice. (2003). Evaluating multijurisdictional drug enforcement task forces. NIJ Journal, 250, 40-42.
- Olson, D. E., Feuerborn, A., Kushner, A., Mata, A., Przybylski, R. K., & Travis, J. (1994). Documenting the extent and nature of drug and violent crime: Developing jurisdiction-specific profiles of the criminal justice system. Chicago, IL: Bureau of Justice Assistance.
- Sontheimer, H. (1993). Multijurisdictional task forces in Pennsylvania. The Justice Analyst 7 (1).
Main Page |
About |
Evaluation and Performance Measures Resources |
Program Areas
Contact Us |
Site Map |
BJA Required Performance Measures |
BJA Home
|