Main Page   Information Sharing/Integration Initiatives   Publications

Publications

Process Evaluations

Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. (2003). Policing smarter through IT: Learning from Chicago's Citizen and Law Enforcement Analysis and Reporting (CLEAR) system. Chicago, IL: Author.

Outcome Evaluations

Benedetti, J. B., McDonough, J., Lilley, G., Allen, K., & Ries, I. (2001). Assessment of criminal justice computer systems. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services.

Hauck, R. V. (1999). COPLINK: A case of intelligent analysis and knowledge management. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona, Department of Management Information Systems.

Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. (2003). Policing smarter through IT: Learning from Chicago's Citizen and Law Enforcement Analysis and Reporting (CLEAR) system. Chicago, IL: Author.

Zaworski, M. J. (2005). Assessing an automated, information sharing technology in the post "9-11" era- Do local law enforcement officers think it meets their needs? Miami, Florida: Florida International University.

Zeng, D., Chen, H., Daspit, D., Shan, F., Nandiraju, S., Chau, M., & Lin, C. (n. d.). COPLINK agent: An architecture for information monitoring and sharing in law enforcement. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Department of Management Information Systems.

Usability Evaluations

Chen, H., Schroeder, J., Hauck, R. V., Ridgeway, L., Atabakhsh, H., Gupta, H., Boarman, C., Rasmussen, K., & Clements, A. W. (2002). COPLINK connect: Information and knowledge management for law enforcement. Decision Support Systems, 34, 271-285.

Hauck, R. V. (1999). COPLINK: Exploring usability of a multimedia database application for law enforcement. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona, Department of Management Information Systems.

Hauck, R. V., Atabakhsh, H., Ongvasith, P., Gupta, H., & Chen, H. (2001). COPLINK concept space: An application for criminal intelligence analysis. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Department of Management Information Systems.

Hauck, R. V., Chau, M., & Chen, H. (2002). COPLINK: Arming law enforcement with new knowledge management technologies. In McIver and Elmagarmid (Eds.), Advances in digital government: Technology, human factors, and policy. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hauck, R. V., Schroeder, J., & Chen, H. (n .d.). COPLINK: Developing information sharing and criminal intelligence analysis technologies for law enforcement. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Department of Management Information Systems.

Other Information Sharing/Integration Initiatives Reports

Arkansas IJIS Office. (2002). A preliminary strategic plan for improving public safety and the administration of justice with information sharing. Little Rock, Arkansas: Author.

Ashley, J. (2006). CLEAR offers enhanced police efficiencies, increased accountability. Chicago, Illinois: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

Baer, D. L., & Picciano, V. M. (2000). Integrated information sharing in juvenile justice systems: Issues, challenges and pitfalls. Bethesda, MD: Development Services Group, Inc.

Blackburn, D. M. (2001). Evaluating technology properly: Three easy steps to success. Corrections Today, (July edition), 56-60.

Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1999). Keynote presentations: 1999 symposium on integrated justice information systems. Washington, DC: Author.

Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2002). Mission possible: Strong governance structures for the integration of justice information systems. Washington, DC: Author.

Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2004). The RISS Program: 2003. Washington, DC: Author.

Bureau of Justice Information Systems, Division of Technology and Management, State Department of Administration. (1999). Justice professionals still lack information to make good decisions. BJIS Update, II, (4), 1-6.

Center for Technology in Government. (2000). Integrating justice information. Innovations, April, 1-8.

Chau, M., Atabakhsh, H., Zeng, D., & Chen, H. (n. d.). Building an infrastructure for law enforcement information sharing and collaboration: Design issues and challenges. Tucson, AZ: Department of Management Information Systems, The University of Arizona.

Cresswell, A. M., Pardo, T. A., Canestraro, D. S., Dawes, S. S., & Juraga, D. (2005). Sharing justice information: A capability assessment toolkit. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.

Cresswell, A., LaVigne, M., Simon, S., Dawes, S., Connelly, D., Nath, S., & Ruda, J. (1999). And justice for all: Designing your business case for integrating justice information business case blueprint. New York: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany/SUNY.

Dawes, S. S., Birkland, T., Tayi, G. K., & Schneider, C. A. (2004). Information, technology, and coordination: Lessons from the World Trade Center response. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY.

Dawes, S. S., Padro, T. A., Green, D. E., McInerney, C. R., Connelly, D. R., & DiCaterino, A. (1997). Tying a sensible knot: A practical guide to state-local information systems. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY.

Department of Criminal Justice Services. (2001). Business case for Virginia integrated justice: Integrated criminal justice information system. Richmond, VA: Author.

ECG Management Consultants. (1997). State of Washington justice information sharing network. Seattle, WA: Author.

Geerken, M. R. (2002). Consequences of inadequately integrated justice information systems. Metairie, LA: Center for Society, Law & Justice, University of New Orleans.

General Accounting Office. (2003). Homeland security. Efforts to improve information sharing need to be strengthened. Washington, DC: Author.

General Accounting Office. (2001). Information sharing: Practices that can benefit critical infrastructure protection. Washington, DC: Author.

Genise, P. (2002). Usability evaluation: Methods and techniques. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Department of Computer Sciences.

Gil-Garcia, R. J., Schneider, C. A., & Pardo, T. A. (2004). Effective strategies in justice information integration: A brief current practices review. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.

Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative Intelligence Working Group. (2003). The national criminal justice intelligence sharing plan. Washington, DC. Author.

Harbitter, A. (n. d.). A critical look at centralized and distributed strategies for large-scale justice information sharing applications: A white paper prepared by the Integrated Justice Information Systems Institute. Washington, DC: Integrated Justice Information Systems Institute.

Harbitter, A., & Langford, J. (2003). Information security in integrated justice applications: An introductory guide for the practitioner. Washington, DC: Integrated Justice Information Systems Institute.

Harris, K. J. (2000). Integrated justice information systems: Governance structures, roles and responsibilities: A background report. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Harris, K. J. (2004). Governance structures roles and responsibilities. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Harris, K. J., & Webster, L. P. (2003). Measuring progress: A summary of key milestones in support of justice integration. Justice IT Brief, Issue 1, 1-4.

Harrison, B. (2002). Fighting crime with information. State Legislatures Magazine, January 2002, 1-3.

Haslip, M., & Wormeli, P. (2007). Interagency information sharing: The National Information Exchange Model. The Police Chief, 74, (4), 32, 34-37.

Hauck, R. V., & Weisband, S. (2002). When a better interface and easy navigation aren't enough: Examining the information architecture in a law enforcement agency. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, (10), 846-854.

Holden, G. A. (2002). Issue brief: Optimizing state investments for justice information sharing. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Economic and Technology Policy Studies Division.

Holmes, A. (2000). Delaware criminal justice information system: The evolution of integration. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Holmes, A., & Johnson, E. (2000). Marin County, California: Criminal justice information system. Case Study Series, Fall 1999/Winter 2000. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Holmes, A., Usery, D, & Roper, R. (2001). Colorado integrated criminal justice information system: Project overview and recommendations. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (2000). Working together: The case for integration of criminal justice information systems. The Compiler, Winter/Spring, 1-20.

International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2000). A study of best practices in information integration projects: Capital wireless integrated network demonstration project (CapWin). Alexandria, VA: Author.

International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2000). Toward improved information sharing: An information integration planning model. Alexandria, VA: Author.

International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2002). Criminal intelligence sharing: A national plan for intelligence-led policing at the local, state and federal levels. Recommendations from the IACP intelligence summit. Alexandria, VA: Author.

International Justice and Public Safety Information Sharing Network. (2007). AISLE II: Accelerated information sharing for law enforcement: Final report. Phoenix, AZ: Author.

Johnson, E. C. (1997). Court automation and integration: Issues and technologies. Technical Bulletin, Issue 2, 1-6.

Krauss, B. (2007). Performance measurement and interoperability. Issue Brief, 5, 1-12.

Lind, M. (1998). Justice integration briefing. Government Technology, April 1998.

Matthews, J. ( 2006). Jail information model. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

McCanna, K. S. L., & Nagel, W. (2006). Illinois making strides in quest for an integrated justice information system. The Compiler, Winter/Spring, 1-5.

Misra, S., & Stamp, P. (2004). White paper: Security and integrated justice information systems. Reston, VA: Unisys Corporation.

Morton, H. (2001). Integrated criminal justice information systems. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.

MTG Management Consultants. (2002). State of North Dakota: Criminal justice information sharing project technology architecture. Seattle, Washington: Author.

NASCIO. (2005). Connecting the silos: Using governance models to achieve data integration. Lexington, KY: Author.

National Association of State Chief Information Officers. (2003). Concept for operations for integrated justice information sharing. Lexington, KY: Author.

National Association of State Chief Information Officers. (2003). Concept for operations for integrated justice information sharing validation report. Lexington, KY: Author.

National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO). (2005). Government information sharing: Calls to action. Lexington, KY: Author.

National Criminal Justice Association. (2001). State's governance of justice information systems integration: Managing decisionmaking in an integrated environment: Observations and insights from the field. Washington, DC: Author.

National Criminal Justice Association and SEARCH. (2001). Who decides? An overview of how states are addressing delegation of authority and decisionmaking in managing integrated justice information systems. Washington, DC: Author.

National Institute of Justice. (2002). Crisis information management software (CIMS) feature comparison report. Washington, DC: Author.

National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center. (2007). Removing communication roadblocks. TechBeat, Winter, 1-3.

Newcomb, T. (1999). Justifying the process: Judicial agencies struggle to learn the process of integration. Government Technology. April, 1999.

NGA Center for Best Practices. (2006). Protecting privacy in integrated justice systems. Washington, DC: Author.

Noblis. (2007). Comprehensive Regional Information System Project volume 1: Metrics for the evaluation of regional information sharing systems. Falls Church, VA: Author.

Noblis. (2007). Comprehensive Regional Information System Project volume 2: Concept operations. Falls Church, VA: Author.

Noblis. (2007). Comprehensive Regional Information System Project volume 3: A practitioner's handbook for law enforcement information-sharing systems: Preliminary requirements. Falls Church, VA: Author.

Office of Homeland Security. (2002). National strategy for homeland security. Washington, DC: Author.

Office of Homeland Security. (2003). The physical protection of critical infrastructures and key assets. Washington, DC: Author.

Office of Justice Programs. (2004). Justice information sharing initiatives: A white paper. Washington, DC: Author.

Police Executive Research Forum. (2003). Toward integrated justice information systems: An update on the law enforcement information technology standards council. Washington, DC: Author.

Prisoc, S. (2001). An enterprise approach to justice information systems in Illinois. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

Prisoc, S. (2001). Justice systems integration: A definition. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

Prisoc, S. (2001). Middleware solutions for integrated justice: Overview and examples. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

Prisoc, S. (2002). Integration architectures: The range of possibilities for justice information systems integration in Illinois. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

Prisoc, S. (2003). Integration standards. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

Rich, T. F. (n. d.). The Chicago police department's information collection for automated mapping (ICAM) program. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Roberts, D. J. (2004). Integration in the context of justice information systems: A common understanding. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Roberts, D. J., Usery, D. H., & Holmes, A. (2000). Planning the integration of justice information systems: Developing justice information exchange points. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Roper, B., & Sullivan, T. (2004). Measuring the success of integrated justice: A practical approach. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

Scherpenzeel, R. (n. d.). Key issues in introducing information technology in criminal justice: United Nations assistance to member states. Vienna, Austria: The United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme Network.

Scholl, H. J. (2005). Interoperability in e-Government: More than just smart middleware. Paper presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI.

Slaski, B., & Coleman, G. (n. d.). Accelerated information sharing for law enforcement (AISLE) using web services. Mclean, VA: Advanced Technology Systems and Madison, WI: Wisconsin Crime Information Bureau.

Slayton, J. (2000). Establishing and maintaining interagency information sharing. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Smith, B., & Tolman, T. (2000). Can we talk? Public safety and the interoperability challenge. National Institute of Justice Journal, April, 1-21.

Sullivan, T. B., & Matthews, M. (2003). Metro/Davidson County, Tennessee: Criminal justice information system: Project overview and keys to success. Case Study Series, Fall 2002/Winter 2003. Sacramento, CA: SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.

U. S. Department of Homeland Security. (2004). Homeland security exercise and evaluation program: Volume I: Overview and doctrine. Washington, DC: Author.

Walker, L. (2002). Integrated criminal justice information systems trends in 2002: Communication, collaboration, and cooperation. Williamsburg, VA: Technology Services, National Center for State Courts.