|
|
 |
Publications
Process Evaluations
- Arbreton, A. J. A., & McClanahan, W. S. (2002). Targeted outreach: Boys & Girls Clubs of America's approach to gang prevention and intervention. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
- Fischer, D. R. (2001). Arizona Department of Corrections: Security Threat Group (STG) program evaluation. Final report. Arizona: Arizona Department of Corrections.
- Gurly, B., & Kane, K. (2002). Seattle Team for Youth Minority Outreach Project process evaluation report: How is the program working? Seattle, WA: Strengthening Services Using Outcomes and Catalyst Coaching & Consulting, Inc.
- Maxson, C. L., Hennigan, K., Sloane, D., & Kolnick, K. A. (2004). Can civil gang injunctions change communities? A community assessment of the impact of civil gang injunctions. California: Social Science Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, and University of California, Irvine.
- Maxson, C. L., Hennigan, K., & Sloane, D. C. (2003). For the sake of the neighborhood?: Civil gang injunctions as a gang intervention tool in Southern California. In S. H. Decker (Ed.), Policing Gangs and Youth Violence (pp. 239-266). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Miller, E., & MacGillivray, L. (2002). Youth Offender Demonstration Project process evaluation: Final report. Chapel Hill, NC: Research and Evaluation Associates, Inc.
- Pennell, S. & Melton, R. (2002). Evaluation of a task force approach to gangs. In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research, (pp.193-218). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
- Pennell, S., Melton, R., & Hoctor, D. (1996). Assessment of a multi-agency approach to drug involved gang members. San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Governments, Criminal Justice Research Division.
- Simun, P. B., Slovacek, S. P, Batie, M., & Simun, M. (1996). Project Support evaluation: Los Angeles unified school district, Report #3-Final evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: California State University, Los Angeles.
- Spergel, I. A., Wa, K. M., Grossman, S., Jacob, A., Choi, S. E., Sosa, R. V., Barrios, E. M., & Spergel, A. (2003). The Little Village Gang Reduction Project in Chicago. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago.
- Tita, G., Riley, K. J., Rideway, G., Grammich, C., Abrahamse, A. F., & Greenwood, P. W. (2003). Reducing gun violence: Results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. California: RAND.
- Thurman, Q. C., Giacomazzi, A. L., Reisig, M. D., & Mueller, D. G. (1996). Community-based gang prevention and intervention: An evaluation of the Neutral Zone. Crime & Delinquency, 42, (2), 279-295.
- Williams, K., Curry, G. D., & Cohen, M. I. (2002). Gang prevention programs for female adolescents: An evaluation. In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research, (pp.225-263). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Outcome Evaluations
- Arbreton, A. J. A., & McClanahan, W. S. (2002). Targeted outreach: Boys & Girls Clubs of America's approach to gang prevention and intervention. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
- Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Piehl, A. M., & Warring, E. J. (2001). The Boston Gun Project: Impact evaluation findings. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
- Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., & Tita, G. E. (2002). New approaches to the strategic prevention of gang and group-involved violence. In C.R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America III (pp. 271-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Braga, A. A., Kennedy, D. M., Waring, E. J., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Problem-oriented policing: Deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, (3), 195-225.
- Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1999). Urban street gang enforcement. Washington, DC: Author.
- Bynum, T. S., & Varano, S. P. (2003). The anti-gang initiative in Detroit: An aggressive enforcement approach to gangs. In S. H. Decker (Ed.), Policing gangs and youth violence (pp. 214-238). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Crowther, B. (2002). Youth gangs in Rhode Island: Perceptions of youth and law enforcement agencies and anti-gang strategies. Providence, RI: Rhode Island Justice Commission, Statistical Analysis Center.
- Clawson, H. J., & Coolbaugh, K. (2001). The YouthARTS Development Project. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Cohen, M., I., Williams, K., Bekelman, A. M., & Crosse, S. (1994). Evaluation of the National Youth Gang Drug Prevention Program. In M. Klein, C. Maxson, & J. Miller (Eds.), The modern gang reader (pp. 226-275). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
- Dahmann, J. (1983). An Evaluation of Operation Hardcore: A Prosecutorial Response to Violent Gang Criminality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
- Decker, S. H., & Curry, G. D. (2003). Suppression without prevention, prevention without suppression. In S. H. Decker (Ed.), Policing gangs and youth violence (pp. 191-213). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Di Placido, C., Simon, T., Witte, T., Gu, D., & Wong, S. (2006). Treatment of gang members can reduce recidivism and institutional misconduct. Law and Human Behavior, 30, (1), 93-114.
- Dunworth, T. (2000). National evaluation of the Youth Firearms Violence Initiative. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Esbensen, F. (2004). Evaluating GREAT: A school-based gang prevention program. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Esbensen, F., Freng, A., Tayler, T. J., Peterson, D., & Osgood, D. W. (2002). National evaluation of the Gang Resistance and Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program. In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research, (pp.139-167). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
- Esbensen, F.A., & Osgood, D. W. (1997). National evaluation of G.R.E.A.T. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Esbensen, F., & Osgood, D. W. (1999). Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.): Results from the national evaluation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 194-225.
- Esbensen, F., Osgood, D. W., Taylor, T.J., Peterson, D., & Freng, A. (2001). How great is G.R.E.A.T.? Results from a longitudinal quasi-experimental design. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, (1), 87-118.
- Everhart, K. L. (2003). An Evaluation of the gang violence suppression program: Final evaluation report. California: Governor's Office of Criminal Justice Planning. Evaluation, Monitoring and Audits Division.
- Fischer, D. R. (2001). Arizona Department of Corrections: Security Threat Group (STG) program evaluation. Final report. Arizona: Arizona Department of Corrections.
- Fritsch, E. J., Caeti, T. J., & Taylor, R. W. (1999). Gang suppression through saturation patrol, aggressive curfew, and truancy enforcement: A quasi-experimental test of the Dallas Anti-Gang Initiative. Crime & Delinquency, 45, (1), 122-139.
- Fritsch, E. J., Caeti, T. J., & Taylor, R. W. (2003). Gang suppression through saturation patrol and aggressive curfew and truancy enforcement: A quasi-experimental test of the Dallas Anti-Gang Initiative. In S. H. Decker (Ed.), Policing gangs and youth violence (pp. 267-284). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Goldstein, A. P., Glick, B., & Gibbs, J. C. (1998). Aggression replacement training: A comprehensive intervention for aggressive youth (revised ed.). Champaign, Ill: Research Press.
- Hagenbucher, G. (2003). PROGRESS: An enhanced supervision program for high-risk criminal offenders. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, September 2003, 20-24.
- Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (1999). Reducing youth gang violence in urban areas: One community's effort. Chicago, IL: Author.
- Josi, D. A. & Sechrest, D. K. (1999). A pragmatic approach to parole aftercare: Evaluation of a community reintegration program for high-risk youthful offenders. Justice Quarterly, 16: 51-80.
- Kennedy, D. M., Braga, A. A., Piehl, A. M, & Waring, E. J. (2001). Reducing gun violence: The Boston Gun Project's Operation Ceasefire. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Kent, D. R., Donaldson, S. I., Wyrick, P. A., & Smith, P. J. (2000). Evaluating criminal justice programs designed to reduce crime by targeting gang offenders. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 115-124.
- Klein, M. W. (1995). The American Street Gang. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Lasley, J. (1998). "Designing out" gang homicides and street assaults. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Levy-McCanna, K. (1999). Making a prison gang-free: The Taylorville Correctional Center. On Good Authority, 2, (7). Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Lurigio, A., Bensiger, G., & Thompson, S. R. (2000). A process and outcome evaluation of Project BUILD: Years 5 and 6. Unpublished Report. Chicago, IL.: Loyola University, Department of Criminal Justice.
- McClanahan, W. S. (2004). Alive at 25: Reducing youth violence through monitoring and support. Philadelphia, Pa.: Public/Private Ventures.
- McGarrell, E. F. & Chermak, S. (2003). Problem solving to reduce gang snd drug-related violence in Indianapolis. In S. H. Decker (Ed.), Policing Gangs and Youth Violence (pp. 77-101). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Nimani, M. (2005). Perceptions of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) Program against gang recruitment efforts. New Britain, CT: Central Connecticut State University.
- Palumbo, D. J., Eskay, R., & Hallet, M. (1992). Do gang prevention strategies actually reduce crime? Presented at the American Society of Criminology, New Orleans, LA, November 1992.
- Palumbo, D., J., & Feruson, J. L. (1995). Evaluating Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT): Is the impact the same as that of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE)? Evaluation Review, 19, (6), 597-619.
- Pennell, S. & Melton, R. (2002). Evaluation of a task force approach to gangs. In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research, (pp.193-218). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
- Pennell, S., Melton, R., & Hoctor, D. (1996). Assessment of a multi-agency approach to drug involved gang members. San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Governments, Criminal Justice Research Division.
- Ramsey, A. L., Rust, J. O., & Sobel, S. M. (2003). Evaluation of the gang resistance education and training (GREAT) program: A school-based prevention program. Education, 124, (2), 297-309.
- Research and Analysis Unit, Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (1997). An evaluation of the Illinois State police gang crime witness protection program. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Sellers, C. S., Taylor, T. J., & Esbensen, F. A. (1998). Reality check: Evaluating a school-based gang prevention model. Evaluation Review, 22 (5), 590-608.
- Scham, P. J. & Gaines, L. K. (2005). Examining delinquent nongang members and delinquent gang members: A comparison of juvenile probationers at intake and outcomes. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 3 (2), 99-115.
- Simun, P. B., Slovacek, S. P., Batie, M., & Simun, M. (1996). Project Support evaluation: Los Angeles unified school district, Report #3-Final evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: California State University, Los Angeles.
- Skogan, W. G. & Steiner, L. (2004). CAPS at Ten. Community policing in Chicago: An evaluation of Chicago's alternative policing strategy. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Solis, A., Schwartz, W., & Hinton, T. (2003). Gang Resistance Is Paramount (GRIP) program evaluation: Final report. California: USC Center for Economic Development, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California.
- Spergel, I. A., Wa, K. M., & Sosa, R. V. (2005). Evaluation of the Bloomington-Normal Comprehensive Gang program. Chicago, Illinois: The School of Social Service Administration, The University of Chicago.
- Spergel, I. A., Wa, K. M., & Sosa, R. V. (2005). Evaluation of the Mesa Gang Intervention program. Chicago, Illinois: The School of Social Service Administration, The University of Chicago.
- Spergel, I. A., Wa, K. M., & Sosa, R. V. (2005). Evaluation of the Riverside Comprehensive Community-Wide Approach to gang prevention, intervention and suppression. Chicago, Illinois: The School of Social Service Administration, The University of Chicago.
- Spergel, I. A., Wa, K. M., & Sosa, R. V. (2005). Evaluation of the San Antonio Comprehensive Community-Wide Approach to Gang Prevention, Intervention, and Suppression program. Chicago, Illinois: The School of Social Service Administration, The University of Chicago.
- Spergel, I. A., Wa, K. M., & Sosa, R. V. (2005). Evaluation of the Tucson Comprehensive Community-Wide Approach to Gang Prevention, Intervention and Suppression program. Chicago, Illinois: The School of Social Service Administration, The University of Chicago.
- Spergel, I. A., Wa, K. M., & Sosa, R. V. (2006). The Comprehensive, Community-Wide, Gang Program model: Success and failure. In J.F. Short & L.A. Hughes (eds.), Studying Youth Gangs (pp. 203-224). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
- Spergel, I. A. (In press). Reducing youth gang crime: The Little Village Gang Violence Reduction Project in Chicago. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
- Tita, G., Riley, K. J., & Greenwood, P. (2003). From Boston to Boyle Heights: The process and prospects of a "pulling levers" strategy in a Los Angeles barrio. In S. H. Decker (Ed.) Policing Gangs and Youth Violence (pp. 102-130). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Tita, G., Riley, K. J., & Greenwood, P. (2005). Reducing Gun Violence: Operation Ceasefire in Los Angeles. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Thurman, Q. C., & Mueller, D. G. (2003). Beyond curfews and crackdowns: An overview of the Mountain Lake Terrace Neutral Zone-Americorps program. In S. H. Decker (Ed.), Policing Gangs and Youth Violence (pp. 167-188). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Toller, W. & Tsagaris, B. (1996). A Practical Approach Combining Security and Human Services. Corrections Today, 58, (6), 110-113.
- Trulson, C.R., Marquart, J.W. & Kawucha, S.K. (2006). Gang Suppression and Institutional Control. Corrections Today, 68 (2), 26-31.
- Vila, B. J., & Meeker, J. W. (1999). Gang activity in Orange County California: Final report to the National Institute of Justice. Wyoming and California: University of Wyoming and University of California, Irvine.
- Wassenberg, P., Dorman, L. G., McGahey, L. A., Syrcle, J., & Bass, B. (2002). An impact evaluation of juvenile probation projects in Christian, Peoria, and Winnebago Counties. Springfield, Illinois: University of Illinois at Springfield, Center for Legal Studies.
- Thurman, Q. C., Giacomazzi, A. L., Reisig, M. D., & Mueller, D. G. (1996). Community-based gang prevention and intervention: An evaluation of the Neutral Zone. Crime & Delinquency, 42, (2), 279-295.
- Tita, G., Riley, K. J., Rideway, G., Grammich, C., Abrahamse, A. F., & Greenwood, P. W. (2003). Reducing gun violence: Results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. California: RAND Public Safety and Justice Program.
- Vogel, R. E., & Torres, S. (1998). An evaluation of Operation Roundup: An experiment in the control of gangs to reduce crime, fear of crime and improve police community relations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21, (1), 38-53.
- Williams, K., Curry, G. D., & Cohen, M. I. (2002). Gang prevention programs for female adolescents: An evaluation. In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research, (pp. 225-263). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Other Gang Programs/Strategies Reports
- Adams, S., & Olson, D. (2002). An analysis of gang members and non-gang members discharged from probation. On Good Authority, 6, (2), 1-4.
- Arbreton, A. J. A., Sheldon, J., & Herrera, C. (2005). Beyond safe havens: A synthesis of 20 years of research on the Boyd & Girls Clubs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
- Arnette, J. L., & Walsleben, M. C. (1998). Combating fear and restoring safety in schools. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Bjerregaard, B. (2003). Antigang legislation and its potential impact: The promises and the pitfalls. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, (2), 171-192.
- Braga, A. A., McDevitt, J., & Pierce, G. L. (2006). Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts. Police Quarterly, 9, (1), 20-46.
- Burch, J. & Chemers, B. M. (1997). A comprehensive response to America's youth gang problem. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Burch, J., & Kane, C. (1999). Implementing the OJJDP comprehensive gang model. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1999). Addressing community gang problems: A model for problem solving. Washington, DC: Author.
- Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1999). Addressing community gang problems: A practical guide. Washington, DC: Author.
- Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1997). Urban street gang enforcement. Washington, DC: Author.
- Carlson, P. M. (2001). Prison interventions: Evolving strategies to control security threat groups. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, (1), 10-22.
- Coldren, J. R. & Higgins, D. F. (2003). Evaluating nuisance abatement at gang and drug houses in Chicago. In S. H. Decker (Ed.), Policing Gangs and Youth Violence (pp. 131-166). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Community Oriented Policing Services & Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2006). Solutions to address gang crime: A resource CD-ROM for law enforcement, version 1.3. Washington, DC: Authors.
- Conference of Mayors Research/Education Foundation. (2006). Gang intervention and gang violence prevention. Washington, DC: Author.
- Davis, M. S., & Flannery, D. J. (2001). The institutional treatment of gang members. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, (1), 37-46.
- Decker, S. (2002). A decade of gang research: Findings of the National Institute of Justice gang portfolio. In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research, (pp.2-23). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
- Egley, A., Jr., Howell, J. C, & Major, A. K. (2006). National youth gang survey 1999-2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Esbensen, F. (2004). Evaluating G.R.E.A.T.: A school-based gang prevention program. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Esbensen, F. (2000). Preventing adolescent gang involvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Esbensen, F-A., Winfree, L. T., He, N., & Taylor, T. J. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter? Crime & Delinquency, 47, (1), 105-130.
- Feyerherm, W., Pope, C., & Lovell, R. (1992). Youth gang prevention and early intervention programs. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
- Fleisher, M. S., & Decker, S. H. (2001). An overview of the challenge of prison gangs. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, (1), 1-9.
- Gottfredson, G. D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (1999). Survey of school-based gang prevention and intervention programs: Preliminary findings. Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates, Inc., Behavioral Science Research and Development.
- Gransky, L., & Cowles, E. L. (1999). An evaluation of the Illinois Department of Corrections' gang-free environment program. Illinois: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
- Guida, J., Barrios, J. T., & Durrant, C. (2005). Reducing gang violence in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Prosecution, policing and prevention; A three-pronged approach. Massachusetts. Joint Committee of Public Safety.
- Hayes, R. (2005). Gangs in North Carolina-A comparative analysis between 1999 and 2004. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Criminal Justice Analysis Center.
- Higgins, D. F., & Coldren, J. R. (2000). Evaluating gang and drug house abatement in Chicago. Chicago, Illinois: University of Illinois at Chicago.
- Houston, J. (1996). What works: The search for excellence in gang intervention programs. The Journal of Gang Research, 3, 1-16.
- Howell, J. C. (1998). Youth gangs: An overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Howell, J. C. (1999). Youth gang homicides: A literature review. Crime & Delinquency, 45, (2), 208-241.
- Howell, J. C. (2000). Youth gang programs and strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Howell, J. C., & Decker, S. H. (1999). The youth gangs, drugs, and violence connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Howell, J. C., & Egley, A., Jr. (2005). Gangs in small towns and rural counties. NYGC Bulletin. Tallahassee, FL: National Youth Gang Center.
- Howell, J. C., & Egley, A. (2005). Gangs in small towns and rural counties. NYGC Bulletin, 1, June, 1-6.
- Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. (2000). Combating gang violence in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood. On Good Authority, 4, (2), 1-4.
- Institute for Intergovernmental Research. (2002). A guide to assessing your community's youth gang problem. Tallahassee, Florida: Author.
- Institute for Intergovernmental Research. (2002). Comprehensive gang model: Planning for implementation. Tallahassee, Florida: Author.
- Johnson, C., Webster, B., & Connors, E. (1995). Prosecuting gangs: A national assessment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
- Johnson, C., Webster, B., Connors, E. F., & Saenz, D. J. (n.d.). Gang enforcement problems and strategies: National survey of findings. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Law and Justice.
- Jones, D., Roper, V., Stys, Y., & Wilson, C. (2004). Street gangs: A review of theory, interventions, and implications for corrections. Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.
- Katz, C. M., & Webb, V. J. (2003). Police response to gangs: A multi-site study. Phoenix, Arizona: Arizona State University West.
- Katz, C. M., & Webb, V. J. (n.d.). Studying the police response to gangs. Cambridge University Press.
- Kent, D. R., & Smith, P. (1995). The Tri-Agency Resource Gang Enforcement Team: A selective approach to reduce gang crime. In M. W. Klein, C. L. Maxson, & J. Miller (Eds.), The Modern Gang Reader (pp. 292-296). CA: Roxbury.
- Klein, M. W. (1995). The American Street Gang. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Knox, G. W. (2001). Female gang members and the rights of children. Copyright: 2001, George Knox.
- Knox, G. W. (2005). The problem of gangs and security threat groups (STG's) in American prisons today: Recent research findings from the 2004 prison gang survey. Peotone, IL: National Gang Crime Research Center.
- Lafontaine, T., Ferguson, M., & Wormith, J. S. (2005). Street gangs: A review of the empirical literature on community and corrections-based prevention, intervention, and suppression strategies. Canada: First Nations University of Canada and University of Saskatchewan.
- Lynch, J. P. & Howell, J. C. (2000). Youth gangs in schools. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Major, A. K., Egley, A., Howell, J. C., Mendenhall, B., & Armstrong, T. (2004). Youth gangs in Indian country. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- McGloin, J. M. (2003). Street gangs and interventions: Innovative problem solving with network analysis. Washington, DC: Community Oriented Policing Services.
- McGloin, J. M. (2005). Policy and intervention considerations of a network analysis of street gangs. Criminology and Public Policy, 4 (3), 607-636.
- Moore, J., & Hagedorn, J. (2001). Female gangs: A focus on research. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin, March, 1-12.
- Nafekh, M., & Stys, Y. (2004). A profile and examination of gang affiliation within the Federally sentenced offender population. Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.
- National Alliance of Gang Investigators Associations. (2005). National gang threat assessment. North Carolina: Author.
- New York Task Force on Juvenile Gangs. (1990). Reaffirming prevention: Report of the task force on juvenile gangs. Albany, NY: New York State Division for Youth.
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1999). Promising strategies to reduce gun violence. Washington, DC: Author.
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2002). OJJDP comprehensive gang model: A guide to assessing your community's youth gang problem. Washington, DC: Author.
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). (2002). OJJDP comprehensive gang model: Planning for implementation. Washington, DC: Author.
- Pitts, L. (2000). Northeast Gang Information System: Description of the systems and lessons learned. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
- Rhyne, A., & Yearwood, D. L. (2005). The nature and scope of Hispanic/Latino gangs in North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Criminal Justice Analysis Center.
- Ruddell, R., Decker, S. H., & Egley, A. (2006). Gang interventions in jails: A national analysis. Chico, California, St. Louis, Missouri and Tallahassee, Florida: California State University, University of Missouri-St. Louis and National Youth Gang Center.
- Spergel, I., Chance, R., Ehrensaft, K., Regulus, T., Kane, C., Laseter, R., Alexander, A., & Oh, S. (1994). Gang suppression and intervention: Community models. Chicago: National Youth Gang Suppression and Intervention Research and Development Program, School of Social Science Administration, University of Chicago.
- Spergel, I., Curry, D., Chance, R., Kane, C., Ross, R., Alexander, A., Simmons, E., & Oh, S. (1994). Gang suppression and intervention: Problem and response. Chicago: National Youth Gang Suppression and Intervention Research and Development Program, School of Social Science Administration, University of Chicago.
- Stinchcomb, J. B. (2002). Promising (and not so promising) gang prevention and intervention strategies: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Gang Research, 10, (1), 27-45.
- Stum, K., & Chu, M. M. (1994). Gang prevention and intervention in a rural town in California: At-risk youths and the community policing school partnership program. Journal of Gang Research, 7, (1), 1-12.
- Takata, S. R. (1994). A community comparison of "youth gang" prevention strategies. Kenosha, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Parkside.
- Thornberry, T. P., & Burch, J. (1997). Gang members and delinquent behavior. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
- Webb, V. J., & Katz, C. M. (2003). Policing gangs in an era of community policing. In S. H. Decker (Ed.) Policing Gangs and Youth Violence (pp. 17-49). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Weisheit, R. A., & Wells, L. E. (2001). Gangs in rural America: Final report. Normal, IL: Department of Criminal Justice, Illinois State University.
- Wyrick, P. (2006). Gang prevention: How to make the "front end" of your anti-gang effort work. United States Attorneys' Bulletin, 54 (3), 52-60.
- Wyrick, P. A., & Howell, J. C. (2004). Strategic risk-based response to youth gangs. Juvenile Justice, 9, (1), 20-31.
Main Page |
About |
Evaluation and Performance Measures Resources |
Program Areas
Contact Us |
Site Map |
BJA Required Performance Measures |
BJA Home
|